The Crumbling State Of Sevco Threatens Our National Game

26783406.jpg.galleryOne of the ways in which I like to relax is to immerse myself in computer games. I don’t play the sort most people would associate with de-stressing though. I enjoy war games, the more complex the better. For that, nothing beats the Total War series.

The most misunderstood of these games is Empire, which is a sprawling epic set in or around the Napoleonic Wars. What made that era perfect for a wargame was that it was, historically, locked in almost constant conflict. Diplomacy in that age mostly involved getting out of the way of the guns, and the reasons why countries went to war were myriad.

It was a dangerous time right across the world.

Hindsight means we can look back at that era and spot all the places along the path to the wars which redrew the map. Yet even then it must have been obvious which countries were to be watched, which were to be viewed as potential threats. Empire lets you do that too. A country with a weak government, a history of treachery, and expansionist ideology and which is short on key resources is one you have to be wary of. If you’re one its neighbours and you’re not locked in a formal military or diplomatic alliance then start arming up.

We have one of those in the vicinity; not a rogue nation, but a rogue football club and the things that happen there have a tendency to cast a dark shadow far beyond the environs of Ibrox. This organisation still has the ability to self-detonate, and because our governing bodies haven’t taken the precautions that would limit the damage to the club itself any scenario in which they explode could still take much of the national sport with it.

Sevco really does resemble a rogue state, you know.

They have a weak government, run by a guy so thin skinned he makes Donald Trump look like a model of composure. Their history of backstabbing, concealment, dodgy deeds and bending rules goes back beyond the current incarnation and deep into that of the club who’s identity they’ve assumed. Their ideology is, in many ways, aggressively expansionist. They believe they are the biggest club in the land and they seek to be taken seriously as a continental player too. In spite of that their economic situation is not only dire, it’s desperate.

It is run by unscrupulous leaders who pander to the worst elements of the populace. It also operates largely unscrutinised by the media, and if it was a country it would be one of those Security Council members who can do as they please without incurring sanctions. When Rangers collapsed in 2012 people talked about how they’d been punished; in point of fact, they never actually were. What happened to them was simply the inevitable consequences of administration, and then liquidation. They were never actually held accountable for the various corrupt practices that got them there, and it’s that that still rankles many today.

Officialdom is either terrified of the Ibrox operation or broadly in sympathy with it. That’s one of the things that worries us the most. There are lots of rumours swirling around about the club and it’s future. Some are more than just speculation, some are grounded in hard fact and they are of grave concern to an awful lot of people. But the chances of anything ever being done to get to the bottom of them are virtually zero. A media blackout of anything negative is guaranteed over there; that’s what gave men like Murray, Whyte, Green and King license to do whatever they pleased.

So let’s analyse the situation over there, not as Celtic supporters looking to get a good laugh – although we can do that too – but as dispassionate outsiders.

First, is the club is in financial danger?

For me, yes, I absolutely do believe that it is.

Do we believe the governing bodies and the media are aware of that?

I don’t see how they cannot be. The facts are freely available. The club makes losses year on year and they’ve recently embarked upon a quite crazy transfer spree which although it hasn’t involved spending big on fees has increased the wage bill massively. This kind of spending is wholly unsustainable for a club which, even at the height of its power, never made the kind of money Celtic consistently has. When your running costs are nearly £20 million before you pay a footballer or coach and that’s barely met by what’s coming in via season tickets you simply can’t afford to go out and sign nine players and give others huge wage increases.

But that’s exactly what they’ve done.

They will burn through the season ticket cash insanely quickly, and then the real fun starts when they’ve got to find more.

As I pointed out over on The CelticBlog last week, we’re fortunate that the SPFL elections have given us – albeit narrowly – a board where the majority is in favour of sporting integrity. It’s this organisation that will be responsible for deciding where any Rangers III ended up. Stewart Robertson shamefully finding his way onto the SFA Professional Game board confronts us with another scenario entirely; it’s entirely possible that the SFA would bend over backwards for the NewCo even to the extent where they tried to force the league body’s hand.

Do I think that could happen?

Sadly, I have to conclude that yes, it could happen and probably would happen. When all you have to go on are the lessons of the past, well we can look back four years and see what they did last time. One would imagine they’d view this situation as even more desperate and fraught with dangers than that one was. Because there are issues here above and beyond any that a club at Ibrox has faced before.

There is a very real threat to even the existence of a club calling itself Rangers.

We’re in truly uncharted territory here.

Just the other day I was listening to an ancient Radio Scotland debate, the one where Chick Young and the idiotic Jim Traynor went toe-to-toe over whether or not Alastair Johnson had nodded his head to confirm that Rangers could go bust if the Big Tax Case went against them. It’s beyond dispute that Johnson and the board were fully aware of the likelihood of that and he didn’t need to inform anyone of that fact. But it caused quite the flare up between the two hacks, because back then none of them could grasp the size of the thing in their hands. They still can’t, which is why so many still cling to the Survival Lie like a comfort blanket.

The Tax Case was the sort of crisis that could have closed their doors, and everyone knew it. I once thought that the collapse of David Murray’s companies could have done the same.

Craig Whyte ran up £20 million worth of bad debts, with a huge sum owed to HMRC. They refused the CVA because of non-payment of PAYE; don’t let anyone kid you that the Big Tax Case is what shut Rangers down. It wasn’t part of the equation. HMRC folded that bill into the final sums which were handed to the liquidators, but with the case still pending at the time it was a phantom issue.

Rangers was closed because of those Craig Whyte debts, but even with the Big Tax Case folded in as long as the assets were available in a liquidation sale there was always going to be a club at the end of it, whatever it called itself, just so long as the debts weren’t part of the package.

Those assets were always tremendously undervalued, or at least that was the perception most people had about them. But what if we were wrong? What if the asset valuation was actually right on? There were no debts, sure, but perhaps those assets came with their own, hidden, liabilities? Recent evidence suggests that they did.

Imagine that Sevco, in its present incarnation, was presented with a bill they simply didn’t have the money to pay? They’d go into administration, right? Easy. Whoever the creditors were they’d get pennies in the pound and the debts would vanish. Correct, but what if that bill couldn’t simply be set aside? What if even a third version of Rangers was impossible without it being paid?

There are some bills which wouldn’t be so easy to dodge, such as one for essential stadium repairs. If such a bill ran into eight digits it would be one that administration, even liquidation, would not be able to erase. That’s as bad as it gets.

If Sevco were unable to get Ibrox up to speed, and were rendered incapable of using the ground, where exactly would that leave them? Season tickets would be rendered worthless overnight. Even if they moved to Hampden on a temporary basis – and the SFA would bend over backwards to let them do that – the impact on their supporters would be considerable.

The impact on their finances would be absolutely catastrophic.

The club has just been granted a new safety certificate for the ground. Even the release of that information is suspect, the manner of it and the tone. Yet this news would appear – on the surface of it – to close the story down completely, but like much else it’s nowhere near as simple as that. Glasgow City Council, unprompted, appeared to confirm that there were problems with the matter. They said there was a delay in giving it to them, and that this was the result of a clerical error. That news has been greeted with frank disbelief in many quarters, especially amongst those of us who know there are issues over there which are in dire need of fixing.

I said in a recent article over on The CelticBlog that if a certificate were granted and something went wrong that a lot of people – the club included – would be in the most serious trouble imaginable. There are some suggestions that the certificate has been granted without a proper investigation taking place; a lot of people do not think it remotely likely that the council would take such a glib attitude towards safety at a public venue; that ignores past precedent, financial concerns and that famous old ugly issue of politics.

Do I believe that a safety certificate might have been granted on a nod and a wink? I am not saying that’s what’s been done, but I sadly can’t conclude that it’s impossible or even unlikely, although I wish to God that it was.

For one thing, Sevco’s board would launch their own legal action against the council, for plunging them into financial chaos. That’s why even shutting the ground whilst a full health and safety investigation takes place hasn’t even been considered. That, in itself, would create enormous problems for the club with a new season about to start. A long term closure, enforced by the HSE, would spark a court battle that could expose the council to serious financial risks. For that reason alone it’s not as simple as it probably should be.

But there’s a much more serious issue at stake.

If Ibrox is closed on the evidence of the council, for a series of expensive repairs, Sevco would collapse like a house of cards. In those circumstances it is highly unlikely that the ground would ever be opened again. The effects of that would be enormous, for the local area, for Scottish football, for the council itself. Its officials would be blamed for closing the doors on the club, however unfair that assertion might be, and with elections coming next year that would hammer the final nail into the coffins of the Labour administration.

The dominos do not stop falling in a scenario like that.

But nor do they stop falling in a scenario where someone is hurt, or God forbid killed, in an incident where a structural flaw results in an accident. Then both club and council would be exposed to searing criminal and civil consequences who’s certain, and inevitable, ending would be to wipe Sevco away. That couldn’t fail to have the direst effects on the whole of Scottish football, our own club included, whether we like it or not.

When Rangers was on the edge last time, it was the so-called leaders of our game who talked it into the shredder.

They crushed its commercial viability, collapsing the value of every sponsorship deal we were likely to get and they would have cast sporting integrity itself aside if they thought they could have gotten away with it. God alone knows what they would do faced with a scenario where the Ibrox club looked like it could vanish forever.

When people ask me why I constantly write about Sevco, why I focus such attention on them, why I waste my time on it, the answer is patently obvious. It’s because of stuff like this. The potential for that club going nuclear remains. That creates dangers for every other club in Scotland. The SFA knows there are financial difficulties over there, but they’ve not insured the sport against that, perhaps because they are unable to believe it could all happen again.

It could. It might. The risks are real.

The one thing at Ibrox you can be absolutely assured of is you can’t predict what will happen there. Trouble can come right out of a clear blue sky. The next twelve months could be as momentous as anything we’ve seen in the last four years.

Be ready for anything.

At a time when the mainstream media can’t even be trusted to cover the biggest sports story in the history of this island sites like this one are more important than ever. If you are able to, and you want to help real Scottish football journalism, and not the sort you get in the tabloids, you can make a donation by clicking the link below.

[paypal-donation]

James Forrest

James Forrest is a writer and blogger from Glasgow, and the author of two books, Fragments and Believers, which are available on Amazon.

14 thoughts on “The Crumbling State Of Sevco Threatens Our National Game

  • 25 July, 2016 at 5:39 pm
    Permalink

    I wonder what Private Eye would make of the latest scandal emanating from Ibrox, involving as it does serious heath and safety issues, possibly life endangering,and possibly with the collusion in a cover up of various public bodies?

    The Eye recently ran a piece on the financial implications of SFA collusion with the old club following the Offshore report, but this scandal is potentially off the radar (to coin a phrase) in terms of seriousness.

    Let us not also forget the culpability and cover up from the old club regarding the last serious incident at the stadium involving major loss of life.

    See the report from Sheriff Irvine Smith which pulls no punches in regard to these matters.

    Given that none of the mainstream media in Scotland want to address these legitimate concerns, I think that Private Eye could do this story justice and open up the can of worms for further scrutiny, hopefully before someone dies.

    I often wonder if Lemony Snicket has been running things at Ibrox in the last few years.

  • 25 July, 2016 at 5:50 pm
    Permalink

    If a safety certificate has been granted it would indicate to me the ground is safe, it maybe in need of some TLC or some on going maintenance of in the case of Ibrox it needs a bit more than that but generally speaking it has to be fit for purpose. My worry is that the duct tape may rip off from the roof given the weather in Scotland leaving the fans exposed to the elements. This may cause upset amongst the home support as their weekly wash would come earlier than expected.

  • 25 July, 2016 at 6:38 pm
    Permalink

    By the way King is behaving and his apparent lack of a plan, could it be possible that King is actively trying to have the lights at Sevco turned off?
    He has stated he sees them playing outside Scotland long term. Is this a mechanism to make that happen?

  • 25 July, 2016 at 6:50 pm
    Permalink

    the last thing anybody wants to see is fans being hurt or worse at a football game regardless of who they support.
    Dave King is playing a very dangerous game, he is actually putting lifes at risk and come the winter months when the storms come in i would be very concerned about the safety of anyone attending ibrox

  • 25 July, 2016 at 7:16 pm
    Permalink

    Freemason in the glasgow city council i remember them refusing celtic a safety certificate when the east end stand was completed they said the public path was not safe we all should know better that they will get away with it again the freemason will make sure of that .
    inside the council and on the board of ibrox aswell as the sfa and the gutter press .

  • 25 July, 2016 at 7:38 pm
    Permalink

    Not being a rangers or Celtic fan ..i can conclusively say what a load of absolute rubbish you so called Celtic fans seam to be shit feared of the so called New.co /Serv.co or the rangers reentering the top division in Scotland because u so called Celtic supporters want to be the top and only gay in the village …..but with the old Gers there u will never be the top team in scottland so my little summary worry about the state of the politic’s and goings on at your own club ….some people eh

  • 25 July, 2016 at 8:48 pm
    Permalink

    I was told over two years ago,that Ibrox was in an 80s time warp,old phones,needing painted,the lot,this person who’s company was involved in using Ibrox during the CGs said he could not understand how it had been given a safety certificate for the CGs Rugby Sevens,so how come it’s got a safety certificate now?
    Frightening!!!

  • 25 July, 2016 at 8:49 pm
    Permalink

    Sevco could use Hampden at the same rates Celtic had to pay. I wonder how King would pay for that nobody takes glass chegues anymore. I suppose the zombies will have to dig deep into their kids savings again????

  • 26 July, 2016 at 12:21 am
    Permalink

    what a load of shit, you guys are just plain sick in the head and not fit to be called football supporters. Go and sit in that shithole called septic park and watch it crumble because your glory days are over, You do not have the team ” Browner as Captain is a joke” and as supporters you are a disgrace to Scottish football

  • 26 July, 2016 at 6:44 am
    Permalink

    Why no concerns, when rangers played in the lower divisions? Running scared you bunch of scare mongering, twisted and delusional sycophants. Concentrate on celtic. Are the celtic, youth players safe? I mean look back in history. Stick to your own club, leave Rangers, be.

  • 26 July, 2016 at 10:11 am
    Permalink

    Glasgow city council is a well known Celtic establishment. Everyone with a little bit of sense knows this to be the case. Are you forgetting the complete refurbishment that Celtic park and surrounding areas got for the commonwealth games? All funded by the council?
    What about lennoxtown aswell? Are you going to talk about the land that Celtic bought off the council for a fraction of what it is really worth?
    Do You actually think organisations as big as the city council and rangers would risk the lives of people attending Ibrox? Come on now , your bitterness towards Rangers is pathetic and you really need to maybe write a wee story about Celtic for once.

  • 26 July, 2016 at 7:31 pm
    Permalink

    I find it hard to believe that Rangers board of Directors would ignore a structural engineers report highlighting pressing safety issues.
    Of course King is not a director of the football club so nowt to do with him as he stands on the outside looking in.
    Have the board of directors seen the full structural engineers report?

    If so then the rumours of imminent roof problems can’t be true….the consequences for the directors don’t bear thinking about.

    GSAG must also have been privy to the engineers report otherwise, given the admission by King that there are issues surrounding the stadium, they are failing in their duty to the public.

    If a safety certificate has been issued on the basis of a nod, wink , handshake and assurances from King, who as we all know is a congenital liar, then hell mend them.

    If anyone suffers injury as a result the Rangers directors will find themselves in big, big, trouble……….but not Mr King, whose only a major shareholder of the company that owns the club.

  • 28 July, 2016 at 8:50 am
    Permalink

    Surely even a snake like King would be above any skullduggery with respect to a safety cert for Greyskull. The consequences if there were a serious accident are unimaginable. Although they did get away with it before.

  • 30 July, 2016 at 8:16 am
    Permalink

    Hope its not full when it collapses in a heap

Leave a Reply

error: Content is protected !!